Nigeria

Mustapha Jokolo: I’m not desperate for Emir of Gwandu stool

Deposed Emir of Gwandu, ‎Alhaji Mustapha Jokolo, said he was not desperate for the stool amidst legal theatrics militating against his re-instatement.

‎Jokolo, who was deposed in 2005 and banished from Kebbi State by the state government had already secured two courts judgments ordering his reinstatement as the Emir of Gwandu.

Both the Kebbi State High Court and the Sokoto judicial division of the Court of Appeal had, in their separate judgements, held that Jokolo was wrongly deposed.

The Court of Appeal, which affirmed the decision of the state High Court, also ordered that all his salaries and entitlements for the 10 years he was out of office be paid to him.

In a unanimous judgment, the three judges of the court led by Justice Tunde Awotoye, held that the deposition of Jokolo by the then governor contravened Sections 6 and 7 of the Chiefs Appointment and Deposition Law of the state.

“It was because the governor neither made an inquiry into the allegation against the emir nor consulted the state’s Council of Chiefs before arriving at his decision.

“The former governor’s action had contradicted Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“The deposed emir was not given a fair hearing before he was dethroned and as such the decision was null and void,’’ the court held.

The judge ordered the reinstatement of Jokolo and the payment of his 10 years salaries and entitlements.

Not satisfied with the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the present Emir of Gwandu, Alhaji Muhammad Bashar and the Kebbi State Government, approached the apex court with separate appeals challenging the judgment of both courts.

Read Also:  Troops kill many Boko Haram terrorists in ambush

In the case of Bashar, he is urging the apex court to set aside the decision of the lower court, adding that he was legitimately appointed as Emir of Gwandu after Jokolo was deposed by the state government.

Bashar had averred that the process of deposing an emir was enshrined in the state’s legal framework, adding that Jokolo’s deposition followed due process.

When the suit came before the Supreme Court, further proceedings where adjourned to February 5, 2019.

Speaking with newsmen after the court proceedings, Alhaji Jokolo, who was present in court, said he was not desperate for the Emir of Gwandu stoolship.

‎In the words of the deposed emir, “Believe me, I am not desperate for the stool. When I was removed, I knew I was going to be removed and the thing that led to my removal I have no regret for it.

“If at anytime I have the opportunity, I will still do what I did, even if I have to be removed from this earth, talk less of the Gwandu throne.

“The beautiful thing is that the court of first instance has declared that I am the true Emir of Gwandu and the appellate court has also said the same thing and I believe the Supreme Court will not say No.”

Read Also:  Rivers government destroys 27 illegal refinery sites, arrests eight persons

‎Meanwhile, when the appeal came up , the court presided by Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, granted an application moved by lead senior counsel to the present Emir (Bashar), Yunus Ustaz (SAN), for leave to raise fresh issues of law and to file an amended notice of appeal against the judgment of the Sokoto judicial division of the Court of Appeal delivered on April 14, 2016.

Other Justices on the five-man panel include, Justices Olukayode Ariwoola; Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun and Amina Augie.

The court also granted Bashar’s application to file additional grounds of appeal and his brief of arguments to encompass arguments on the issues formulated from the amended notice of appeal.

The apex court further granted an order deeming the proposed appellant’s brief of arguments as properly filed and served.

However, Ustaz told the court that the motion seeking the consolidation of the two appeals was not ready and was accordingly adjourned to February 5, 2019.

The court equally granted the application by the Kebbi State Government, moved by its counsel, Yakubu Maikyau (SAN) for an extension of time to cross- appeal the judgment of the Court of Appeal as well as leave to raise fresh issues in the appeal.

Although, the counsel to Jokolo, Samson Audu did not opposed to the applications, he was not comfortable with adjourning the motions for the consolidation of the appeals.

Get more stories like this on Facebook, Twitter and Telegram